Skip to main content

Duel Casino Owner Allegedly Banned from X in Controversial Exchange

Share on Social

On October 24, 2025, Ossi Ketola, the outspoken owner of Duel Casino who is widely recognized online as Monarch, claimed during a live Twitch stream that he was banned from the social media platform X because of a monetary transaction. The incident has stirred significant controversy in the online gambling community, particularly as Ketola suggested that this was part of a strategic attempt to silence him.

According to Ketola, a substantial sum of money was allegedly exchanged to ensure his removal from the platform. This action didn’t just affect his personal account; the official X account for Duel Casino was also suspended, raising questions about the motivations behind these bans. Ketola expressed his frustration, noting that the timing coincided suspiciously with the launch of new RTP (Return to Player) games at Duel Casino. “It feels like a calculated attack,” he lamented, emphasizing that his immediate goal was to have both accounts reinstated.

The allegations made by Ketola introduce a debate about the integrity of platform moderation on X. While he has not provided specific evidence or named the parties he believes are behind this campaign, his claims have sparked discussions about the influence of money on social media platforms and the potential for abuse of power.

There is yet to be an official response from X regarding the reasons for the suspension of these accounts. The platform has not confirmed or denied Ketola’s allegations, and it is unlikely to publicly acknowledge any transactional influence on account suspensions. Observers and industry insiders suggest an alternative explanation: Ketola’s history of provocative statements and controversial behavior might have led to a breach of X’s community guidelines, prompting the suspensions.

Ketola is no stranger to controversy. Known for his candid and often incendiary remarks, he has earned a reputation that courts both admiration and criticism. His style, while engaging to some, can alienate others, making it plausible that his outspoken nature finally clashed with platform policies. Despite this, Ketola is not just a polarizing figure; he is also a skilled poker player with notable achievements, including a victory at the Triton Poker Super High Roller Series Jeju, where he took home an impressive $12.7 million.

The incident highlights ongoing tensions between content creators and digital platforms, particularly concerning moderation policies and perceived censorship. Ketola’s assertions tap into a broader narrative where influencers and businesses feel vulnerable to platform decisions that can significantly impact their reach and revenues.

An alternative perspective suggests that the ban might have been a necessary action due to Ketola’s rhetoric, which can be divisive. This viewpoint argues that platforms like X have a responsibility to enforce community standards to ensure a respectful and safe user environment. From this angle, the suspension could be seen as a routine enforcement of these standards rather than the result of an external influence.

In the broader context of the gambling industry, Ketola’s claims draw attention to the competitive and sometimes cutthroat nature of the business. The launch of new RTP games by Duel Casino represents a significant development, potentially disruptive enough to provoke competitive responses. However, critics of Ketola’s theory point out that without concrete evidence, it remains speculative to attribute the account bans to financial transactions or rival sabotage.

As the situation develops, the industry is keenly observing the outcome. Should Ketola manage to have his accounts reinstated, it might prompt discussions about transparency and fairness in platform moderation. Conversely, if the suspensions are upheld, it could reinforce the perception that platforms are active in maintaining their policies, regardless of external pressures or high-profile allegations.

In conclusion, Ossi Ketola’s allegations against X have ignited a debate that extends beyond the confines of a single platform and touches on wider issues of power, influence, and the rights of digital content creators. As the story unfolds, it will serve as a case study in the complex dynamics between business interests, personal expression, and platform governance in the digital age.