Skip to main content

Illinois’ Per-Wager Tax Reshapes Sports Betting Market

Share on Social

In June 2025, Illinois implemented a new per-wager tax, fundamentally altering the sports betting landscape in the state. This measure introduced a $0.25 tax on the initial 20 million online wagers each fiscal year, escalating to $0.50 per wager thereafter. This policy has been met with criticism from sportsbooks, which view it as a potentially damaging strategy for consumer engagement.

September saw a swift response from major operators, with Caesars leading the charge by applying a $0.25 fee per bet, timing the adjustment with the NFL season kickoff. Parlay bets are treated as a single wager under this system, but bettors who enjoy placing numerous low-stakes bets on weekends now face significant additional costs.

Fanatics mirrored Caesars’ approach with a similar $0.25 fee. In contrast, FanDuel and DraftKings set their fee at $0.50. This decision, while making economic sense given their market dominance in Illinois, highlights their vulnerability due to the sheer volume of bets they handle under the new tax structure.

In response to the tax, other operators have adopted different strategies. BetMGM, BetRivers, ESPN BET, and Hard Rock Bet opted to increase minimum bet sizes instead of imposing direct fees. Although this approach appears more consumer-friendly, it still presents challenges for casual bettors who prefer low-cost, low-risk betting options. Circa, catering to high-stakes players, introduced a $10 minimum bet, effectively eliminating micro-betting in Illinois.

The increased cost of placing small bets has sparked concern among casual bettors, who are disproportionately affected by these changes. As operators adjust their business models, the state has become one of the most expensive for small-stakes gambling. Some industry insiders warn that this could drive bettors to offshore platforms, which offer advantages like no taxes, no minimums, and attractive promotional deals.

The Sports Betting Alliance has raised concerns that the tax, originally meant to target large operators, now unfairly penalizes recreational bettors. Online forums are abuzz with small-stakes players expressing frustration, with some declaring they would rather stop betting or travel to Indiana to avoid the new fees.

This situation presents a complex challenge for Illinois’ sports betting market. While the state aimed to increase revenue from large-scale operators, the unintended consequences are now manifesting as a strain on casual consumers. The potential migration to offshore betting sites or neighboring states could undermine the state’s regulatory intentions and revenue goals.

Operators like Caesars and Fanatics, standing by their fee-based model, argue that the tax’s implementation necessitates such changes to maintain operational viability. Yet, some voices within the industry suggest a more balanced approach could be achieved by adjusting the tax structure to preserve accessibility for all types of bettors.

There remains a significant debate over whether Illinois’ approach will ultimately benefit the state. Advocates for the tax believe it could eventually lead to a more equitable contribution from major operators, potentially leveling the playing field. However, the risk remains that casual players may permanently shift their betting habits elsewhere, leading to a contraction in the local market.

The evolving dynamics in Illinois highlight the delicate balance states must strike when regulating the rapidly growing sports betting industry. As the market adjusts, all eyes are on whether the current strategies will sustain or force further policy revisions to protect consumer interests while bolstering state revenues. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether Illinois’ tax policy serves as a model for other states or a cautionary tale of unintended consequences.