Gambling News

Norsk Tipping’s Personalised Calls Cut Gambling Losses

Norsk Tipping’s Personalised Calls Cut Gambling Losses
Norsk Tipping's Personalised Calls Cut Gambling Losses
Share on Social

Study Validates Impact of Intervention

A recent study backs Norsk Tipping’s strategy to call at-risk gamblers, showing large reductions in gambling behavior. From 2022 to 2024, the state-owned Norwegian operator contacted 4,752 customers through its duty-of-care program. By comparing gambling behaviors before and after these calls, researchers found a notable decline in various metrics, such as the number of days gambled, total wagers, and net losses. Interestingly, the most major decreases were in days gambled and net losses. Norsk Tipping’s approach isn’t new—they’ve been making these calls since 2015. Triggers include large losses in certain age groups and among new players. The company uses tools like Spillepuls to identify these at-risk individuals.

Younger Players See Greater Impact

Calls were more effective among users flagged by the operator’s Spillepuls system, targeting heavy losses among young and new players, and those escalating into high-risk categories. Remarkably, 43.7% of the contacted participants chose to lower their loss limits, and 12.6% opted for self-exclusion during these interventions. The youth were especially responsive, with 60.7% of self-referring young players reducing their limits, leading to sharper declines in gambling activity. This isn’t the first attempt at a data-driven approach to curb gambling issues. The systematic reduction for certain player categories signals that younger users and those who actively participate in the intervention see the most improvement.

Context and Challenges

In the market of Norway’s tightly regulated gambling market, Norsk Tipping operates with a state-sanctioned monopoly. This lets them employ measures that might not fly elsewhere — a luxury private operators don’t have. And it’s not just about stopping gambling; it’s about minimizing harm. The proactive nature of Norsk Tipping’s model contrasts with other jurisdictions where self-exclusion and voluntary limits are the primary tools. Still, traditional methods often require the gambler to acknowledge the problem first—an uncommon occurrence. But it’s not all black and white. But players with entrenched patterns of high-risk gambling showed lower responsiveness to these single-call interventions, underlining the complexity of addiction and the limitations of even the best-monitored systems.

What’s Next for Norsk Tipping?

Norsk Tipping’s findings will likely influence future policy, reinforcing calls for early intervention mechanisms. And as their duty-of-care program evolves, additional strategies might emerge to target entrenched gamblers. The board is expected to review these results soon, possibly leading to an expansion of personalized intervention techniques. Norwegian regulators may also ponder adopting similar strategies more broadly, increasing pressure on international operators to step up their responsible gambling initiatives.

Latest