Skip to main content

Swedish Government Moves to Ban Gambling with Credit

Share on Social

The Swedish government has initiated a significant policy shift by proposing amendments to the Gambling Act of 2018, aimed at prohibiting licensed operators from facilitating gambling through credit. Currently, the law only restricts credit directly provided by gambling operators, leaving a loophole that allows players to finance their bets using credit from other sources. This legislative push seeks to close that gap, essentially preventing gambling-related indebtedness by banning all forms of betting financed with borrowed funds, including credit card payments.

Set to take effect on April 1, 2026, the amendments will apply to both online and land-based gambling activities. However, there will be potential exemptions for operators who offer gambling with a public benefit goal. The regulatory body Spelinspektionen will oversee the enforcement of these new measures. The proposed changes underscore a growing concern over gambling-related financial issues, with the government taking a more protective stance towards consumers.

Contextually, Sweden’s move reflects a broader international trend where various governments are tightening regulations to address the negative social impacts of gambling. The focus is shifting towards a more participant-oriented perspective rather than targeting specific gambling markets. Such a change is intended to streamline enforcement and make regulatory oversight more efficient, especially in rapidly evolving gambling landscapes.

There is a strong sentiment within Swedish political circles that the time has come to address the issue head-on. The belief is that limiting access to credit for gambling purposes will significantly reduce cases of problem gambling and associated financial distress. As noted by one official, the aim is to create a safer gambling environment where individuals are less likely to fall into the trap of debt. “We must ensure that gambling remains a form of entertainment, not a path to ruin,” was a sentiment frequently echoed during discussions on the amendment.

However, not everyone agrees with this approach. Critics argue that such restrictions could drive problem gamblers to unregulated markets, where protections are minimal. They contend that a more balanced approach, focusing on education and responsible gambling measures, could be more effective without pushing consumers away from the regulated market.

In a contrasting development in the United States, Hard Rock International’s ambitious $8 billion hotel casino project in New York received unanimous approval from the Community Advisory Committee. This venture, in collaboration with New York Mets owner Steve Cohen, will see the creation of a massive casino resort near the Mets’ Citi Field ballpark in Queens. The project includes amenities like athletic fields, a transit station, public park space, and a food hall.

This proposal is part of a competitive race for one of the three available casino licenses in New York State, with the New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC) having received eight applications. The decision regarding the casino licenses is anticipated in December. The approval from the Advisory Committee marks a significant step towards a potential transformation in the New York gambling landscape, which could see substantial economic benefits and job creation.

Meanwhile, in the UK, the gambling industry is bracing for potential changes as British Chancellor Rachel Reeves hints at a possible increase in gambling taxes. With over 100 Labour MPs and the Liberal Democrats advocating for higher taxes on online gambling, there is mounting pressure on the government to act. While specific details have yet to be unveiled, suggestions have been made to potentially double the current online gambling tax from 21% to 40% of gross gambling yield.

The gambling sector has fiercely criticized these proposals, labeling them as shortsighted and warning of possible negative repercussions. The Betting and Gaming Council has pointed to the experiences of other jurisdictions, such as the Netherlands, where similar tax hikes have impacted industry revenues and market stability. Yet, the counterpoint from proponents is that gambling firms should contribute fairly to public finances, given the social costs associated with gambling-related harm.

In another European context, Denmark’s gambling sector recorded a 12.8% rise in revenue year-on-year for July, totaling DKK634 million. This increase was primarily driven by online casino operations, which saw a 20.5% surge, with online slots being the most popular. Sports betting also experienced growth, although land-based slot machine revenue slightly declined. The Danish government is contemplating reforms to gambling laws, particularly focusing on advertising restrictions during sports events, to mitigate gambling addiction risks.

Finally, Finland’s efforts to liberalize its gambling market have encountered constitutional scrutiny. The Constitutional Committee has returned the proposed Finnish Gambling Act to the Administrative Committee for clarification, citing concerns over ambiguous wording and potential constitutional infringements. The legislation is intended to dismantle Veikkaus’s monopoly and introduce a multi-license system by 2027, yet clarity on marketing rules and the tax framework remains essential. Despite these hurdles, operators like Paf are preparing for market entry, underscoring the anticipated regulatory shift.

These various developments across the globe illustrate the dynamic nature of the gambling industry, where regulatory frameworks continually evolve in response to economic, social, and political pressures. As jurisdictions strive to balance industry growth with consumer protection, the outcomes of these regulatory changes will be closely monitored by stakeholders worldwide.