Amazon has consented to a $201 million settlement to conclude a class-action lawsuit alleging its involvement in illegal online gambling through social casino apps. If a federal judge approves, the agreement will settle accusations led by Nevada resident Steve Horn, claiming Amazon profited by hosting these apps on its Appstore. The deal centers around a covenant judgment valued at over $201.3 million — about 30% of what class members allegedly spent on the apps.
In This News
Amazon Shifts Financial Responsibility to Developers
Interestingly, Amazon won’t directly pay the settlement. Instead, the tech giant allows the class’s legal team to attempt to recover funds from the app developers. As stated in the settlement, Class Counsel will act on Amazon’s behalf, aiming to enforce indemnity clauses against developers accountable for the gambling apps’ revenue. This path incentivizes developers to engage in the settlement process, potentially leading to quicker resolutions of indemnification claims. Notably, Amazon hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing. The company emphasized that apps must adhere to legal standards and that it retains the right to remove any app. “This settlement lets us keep offering choices on our Appstore,” Amazon commented, highlighting developers’ required improvements to enhance user experience.
Legal Background and Broader Implications
The case surfaced in Washington, rooted in U.S. federal court’s 2018 decision that social games might be classified as gambling under state law if they monetize gameplay credits. Judge Milan Smith from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recognized these credits as “something of value,” aligning with Washington’s gambling definitions. The state considers gambling to involve risking value for uncertain outcomes beyond personal control or influence. While Amazon navigates this settlement, other tech heavyweights like Apple, Google, and Meta face similar legal challenges — each denying any malpractice. These cases spotlight the complex legal market around social gaming, an area steadily attracting regulatory attention.
Lingering Questions and Future Developments
A pivotal question remains whether app developers will shoulder the financial burden. The settlement’s financial recovery mechanism relies on developers honoring their indemnification obligations, a process that could prove legally intricate and prolonged. Furthermore, the outcome could influence pending cases against other major tech firms. The next step hinges on a federal judge’s decision to approve the settlement’s terms. Still, this ruling will likely set a precedent influencing how social casino apps are treated across digital platforms in the future.
Eri Gaitu leads the news desk at Best in Slot, tracking breaking developments across the gambling world in real time. From exclusive bonus offers and casino launches to licensing updates and regulatory shifts, Eri ensures readers are always first to know about the changes that matter to their gaming experience.
