India’s Supreme Court is currently examining a public interest litigation (PIL) initiated by the Centre for Accountability and Systemic Change (CASC). This organization, which aims to promote transparency and uphold the rule of law, has taken a firm stand against online gambling platforms that masquerade as social games or esports.
According to reports, these platforms have attracted a staggering 650 million online gamblers, contributing to a lucrative annual business worth ₹1.8 lakh crore (approximately $20.5 billion) in India. This burgeoning industry, however, is under scrutiny as the PIL urges the court to align national and state laws through the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025. The proposed legislation seeks to ban online gambling and betting games, even those disguised as skill-based games like fantasy sports and poker.
Tech giants such as Apple Inc. and Google India Pvt Ltd have been named in the petition, highlighting the significant role technology companies play in proliferating these gaming platforms. CASC is urging legislative action from India’s parliament to enforce a ban on all forms of online gaming involving real money. The organization emphasizes that these activities are largely considered illegal across most Indian states, and the societal and economic fallout has become a pressing concern.
The PIL further insists on empowering authorities to block illegal betting sites and apps, halt financial transactions linked to unregistered gaming applications, and conduct thorough investigations into the companies hosting these platforms. The call for action is urgent, as advocates claim that online gambling poses a threat to societal welfare and national security. The IT Minister’s speech in Parliament underscored the need to curb the “serious evil” infiltrating society through these activities.
Despite the push for stringent regulations, there is a counterpoint from industry stakeholders who argue that a complete ban could drive the market underground, making it even harder to regulate. They suggest that a more balanced approach would involve regulation and taxation rather than prohibition. In fact, earlier this year, the government introduced a 40% sin tax on gambling and luxury goods, sparking debates about its impact on the industry and consumer behavior.
However, CASC remains resolute in its mission to dismantle the infrastructure supporting online gambling. The organization believes that decisive court intervention is necessary to stop the spread of unregulated gaming which, they argue, not only disrupts families but also strains the country’s resources. “The current scenario demands urgent legal reform to protect vulnerable individuals from being exploited by these platforms,” they argue, reflecting a widespread sentiment among concerned citizens.
Conversely, some market analysts caution against overly restrictive measures, warning that it may stifle innovation and deter foreign investment in India’s burgeoning tech sector. They advocate for a framework that encourages responsible gaming, allowing players to enjoy these platforms within a controlled and safe environment.
As the Supreme Court deliberates, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for how India navigates the complex world of online gaming regulation. Whether the court will lean towards a complete ban or a regulated model remains to be seen, but the decision will undoubtedly reverberate across the industry.
In the meantime, the debate continues to unfold, with stakeholders from various sectors weighing in on how best to approach the challenges posed by online gambling. While some argue for the economic benefits and job creation associated with the industry, others remain focused on the societal costs and the need for comprehensive legal frameworks to address these issues.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision will have far-reaching implications, shaping the future landscape of online gaming in India. As policymakers, industry leaders, and activists await the verdict, the conversation about balancing economic growth with societal welfare persists, reflecting the complexity of the issue at hand.
Garry Sputnim is a seasoned journalist and storyteller with over a decade of experience in the trenches of global news. With a keen eye for uncovering stories that resonate, Alex has reported from over 30 countries, bringing light to untold narratives and the human faces behind the headlines. Specializing in investigative journalism, Garry has a knack for technology and social justice issues, weaving compelling narratives that bridge tech and humanity. Outside the newsroom, Garry is an avid rock climber and podcast host, exploring stories of resilience and innovation.
