Skip to main content

Norsk Tipping’s Monopoly on Gambling in Norway Remains Intact

Share on Social

Norsk Tipping, Norway’s state-owned gambling operator, will continue to hold its monopoly in the country following the Labour Party’s victory in the recent general election. Despite a wave of criticism and some regulatory mishaps, the political landscape indicates stability in keeping the current gambling structure intact.

Under the leadership of Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, the Labour Party has secured a second term in office, achieving a narrow two-seat majority in the 169-seat parliament. They garnered support from four smaller center-left parties, ensuring that the existing monopoly on gambling remains unchallenged. This outcome disappoints the populist right-wing Progress Party, which advocates for ending the monopoly. The Progress Party saw a significant increase in support, securing 48 seats and nearly 24 percent of the vote, but fell short of gaining enough influence to change the status quo.

Leading up to the election, Norsk Tipping faced increasing scrutiny. The Norwegian gambling regulator, Lotteritilsynet, launched a comprehensive review of Norsk Tipping’s Lotto, Eurojackpot, and Vikinglotto games. This action was prompted by “poor control over its games,” which led to a high-profile resignation of CEO Tonje Sagstuen after thousands of players were mistakenly informed they had won substantial Eurojackpot prizes.

The controversies did not end there. A significant blunder involved a player erroneously receiving a NOK 25 million (€2.1 million) payout from the KongKasino game. Additionally, for a period of four months, a technical issue prevented players using iPhones or iPads from self-excluding from Norsk Tipping’s games. This glitch went unnoticed until a player brought it to the attention of the regulator, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the company’s oversight mechanisms.

Moreover, Lotteritilsynet discovered longstanding draw errors in the Eurojackpot and other major draws, which unfairly advantaged syndicates and gambling clubs, resulting in incorrect winners over several years.

Despite these challenges, the Labour Party’s electoral success suggests that Norsk Tipping’s monopoly will be protected for another four years. This stability is likely to extend to current enforcement measures such as payment blocking and DNS restrictions against unlicensed offshore gambling sites.

However, not all political voices in Norway are unified in supporting the monopoly. While the Progress Party remains the most vocal critic, advocating for gambling market liberalization, some members of the conservative Høyre party, like Tage Pettersen, have expressed interest in opening the market to commercial competition. They point to neighboring countries such as Denmark and Sweden, which have adopted competitive regulated markets, and Finland’s ongoing efforts to dismantle the state-controlled monopoly of Veikkaus with plans to introduce a competitive licensed market by 2027.

For now, the political climate in Norway favors maintaining the status quo. The Labour Party’s win signals continuity in the nation’s gambling policies, aiming to protect consumers from the risks associated with unregulated gambling environments. Proponents of the monopoly stress the importance of safeguarding Norwegian gamblers through stringent regulations and controlled environments.

Those advocating for market liberalization argue that opening the market could increase consumer choice and potentially improve regulatory oversight by introducing competition. The alternative viewpoint suggests that regulated competition could mirror the success seen in other Nordic countries, providing benefits such as increased government revenue and enhanced consumer protections.

In conclusion, despite the recent controversies and mounting pressure for change, Norsk Tipping’s monopoly is set to persist under the Labour Party’s governance. The upcoming years will likely see continued debates on the future of gambling regulation in Norway, with contrasting perspectives on consumer protection and market dynamics shaping the discourse.