Gambling News

Gaming Organizations Call on Congress to Exclude Sports from Prediction Markets

Gaming Organizations Call on Congress to Exclude Sports from Prediction Markets
Gaming Organizations Call on Congress to Exclude Sports from Prediction Markets
Share on Social

American gambling organizations are urging Congress to address the use of sports event contracts in prediction markets under existing cryptocurrency legislation. In a unified move, groups like the American Gaming Association (AGA), Indian Gaming Association, and Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers have issued a letter to the U.S. Senate, calling for a prohibition on such contracts. This letter asserts that sports event contracts represent a form of unregulated sports betting, jeopardizing the regulatory frameworks set by individual states. “Offering nationwide sports betting through so-called ‘sports event contracts’ as a federally regulated financial product skirts state and tribal law, diminishes consumer protections, and undermines a system based on local control,” the letter states. It’s a pointed critique of these platforms, which the industry contends bypasses legal guidelines meant to safeguard state and local interests.

Industry Push for Legislative Action

The industry’s call to action isn’t without precedent. Federal lawmakers have already tabled several bills aimed at tightening the reins on prediction markets. The Digital Market Clarity Act is at the center of the industry’s lobbying efforts, with a push to explicitly ban sports and casino-style contracts. This industry push coincides with a wave of lawsuits brought by state regulators against prediction market operators and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over who has the authority to regulate sports event contracts. Still, “This is fundamentally a question of congressional intent,” the letter continues. “Congress shouldn’t allow this nationwide gambling expansion to proceed without proper legislative oversight. The use of crypto legislation is key to reaffirm that sports betting is outside the CFTC’s jurisdiction.”

Broad Coalition of Support

The letter isn’t just backed by the AGA, IGA, and AGEM. A slew of other national organizations have thrown their weight behind it, including the 60 Plus Association, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy, and the National Thoroughbred Racing Association. Additionally, a host of state tribal, regulatory, and labor groups have signed on, demonstrating a broad base of support for this legislative change.

CFTC’s Regulatory Ambitions

In the midst of jurisdictional battles over event contracts, the CFTC has been pushing forward its own regulatory framework. Last week, the commission unveiled a 267-page rulemaking proposal, opening it up for a 45-day public comment period. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig remarked, “The CFTC will protect the integrity of our regulated markets without hindering responsible innovation. This proposal introduces a transparent framework to scrutinize the contracts identified by Congress, allowing legitimate markets to thrive.”

The CFTC’s new rules propose a broadened definition of gaming, which would include sports event contracts on prediction markets. Certain contracts, however, could be banned if they’re found to contravene public interest. Some prediction market operators are already engaging with lawmakers and regulators to improve their market positions.

Next Steps

While the CFTC moves forward with its rulemaking process, the gambling industry’s efforts to influence Congress will likely intensify. The legislative discussion around prediction markets and sports event contracts is expected to continue throughout the year, with potential implications for how these markets operate in the future.

Latest